An SEO comparison of and

For years, has had a Google rankings nemesis in For much of the time that I’ve spent watching the results for the search phrase ‘ardamis’, has consistently ranked #1, and typically landed in second or third place. But at some point in 2011, and my recollection is that this was occurring pre-Panda, moved to the top spot and has stayed there since.

Google search results for ardamis on March 15, 2012

Google search results for ardamis on March 15, 2012

The top 10 results returned for ‘ardamis’ as of March 15, 2012, while not signed in to Google, connecting from Chicago, IL, using IE9:

  3. //
  4. //

I can’t really explain why a post from 2005 on configuring a setting in Apache would be the second best page on the site, but I guess I’ll take it. My properties do pretty well, for what isn’t a highly competitive phrase. Items related either to or me personally appear in positions 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10.

I’ve done some comparing of these two domains, and I am still unsure why Google is currently favoring


I felt pretty confident that geography and Google’s focus on local search would mean that North American users would be returned results that favored, so long as they were not obviously searching for travel information about Greece. But this isn’t proving to be a safe assumption. Even more strange is that it’s the Greek language version of the page that Google is ranking first, even before the English language version. This promotion of a foreign-language page is very odd.


Google Toolbar Page Rank (I know, I know, but it’s one of many metrics I’ll use) shows getting a 5 and getting a 3. I won’t make too much of this, but I wanted to point out that the toolbar PR is not equal.

I ran the list of URLs on the first page of Google through the Open Site Explorer to get a better sense of how strong the pages and domains were, and comes out on top.

URL Page Authority Domain Authority Links 45.29 34.3 433 23.65 34.3 33 74.06 69.38 149621 42.18 69.38 29

As the table shows, the home page at has significantly more Page Authority than the home page at, the domain has more Domain Authority than, and has 300 times the number of inbound links. (Although, the vast majority of inbound links come from footer links in the various WordPress and Plogger themes I’ve designed. See below.)

Author attribution

The pages on all contain verified authorship markup linking them to my Google Plus profile, and I get my profile picture next to my pages in the results.

I don’t detect any author markup on

Structured markup

The pages on contain structured markup (HTML5 microdata as described at and hCard microformat). The Rich Snippets Testing Tool returns no warnings for Rich snippets from the pages at are displayed as part of the page data in Google’s results.

The page at does not contain authorship or rich snippet markup.

Site links

In July of 2009, had a Toolbar Page Rank of 6 and 3 one-line sitelinks, before later disappearing. Then, in October of 2010, the sitelinks returned for awhile before disppearing again. I last noticed the sitelinks in January of 2011.

(I would point out that the site still shows sitelinks when searching for my name.)

Inbound links

I’ve developed and released a WordPress theme and a few Plogger themes, and put links back to and the theme’s post in the footer. These links have helped the home page gain nearly 2 million inbound links, with the Apricot WordPress theme’s page gaining nearly 1.5 million and the most popular Plogger theme’s page gaining just over 70,000. That’s a lot of links.

Page Speed

Google’s Page Speed Online tool awards a Page Speed Score of 96 (out of 100), while gets a score of 68 (out of 100).

I have put quite a bit of effort into optimizing the performance, and I’m pretty happy with a 96.


Post-Panda, I combed through and weeded out the posts that I was unsure about.

Other domains

I also own and, and have one-page placeholders at these domains with links back to


At this point, I wonder if is suffering a penalty somewhere. Maybe all of those footer links are actually hurting the site.

Or maybe the combination of a country code top-level domain and a real geographic location is just incredibly powerful when compared to a random word attached to a .com domain.

2 thoughts on “An SEO comparison of and

  1. Alex

    Maybe it’s click through rate. It’s unlikely to be a penalty given that you are ranked #3 and #4

  2. Corey

    It might have something to do with comments… Google has an auto-filtering system that they use to sort of discount the results from what they refer to as “comment spamming” — It is controversial and is known to hurt legitimate sites.

    This might have nothing to do with it at all, I’m basically at a loss for words. That’s all I can come up with and even with that I’m still reaching. I definitely would contact Google and tell them that you’re not complaining or anything, it’s just that as a webmaster you’re trying to understand what factors allowed this to happen so that you can work to improve your site’s appearance on Google’s search results..

Comments are closed.